Kranz v. Hiatt
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLMER, District Judge.
Petitioner, after indictment, was duly tried and convicted. He now alleges in a second application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed in this district that an involuntary confession was introduced in evidence before the Grand Jury, and that the indictment so obtained failed to show venue in the District of New Jersey.
The confession, hereinafter referred to, was voluntary and the indictment 1 for conspiracy clearly alleges venue within • the District of New Jersey with overt acts committed therein. The mere fact that petitioner’s participation in the conspiracy was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte SmithDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
- Miller v. HiattCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Eury v. HuffCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Ex Parte SteeleDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Walsh v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. KranzDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1949