Legal Opinion

Succession of Roth

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 18, 1915No. 6277Published

Appeal from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Division “B,” No. 105,023. Honorable F. D. King, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

His Honor, CHARLES F. CLAIBORNE,

rendered the opinion and decree of the 'Court, as follows:

Plaintiff, William H. Byrnes, Jr., is an attorney at law.

He sues for fees as curator ad hoc herein.

The facts are as follows:

Charles N. Roth died, leaving a widow and two minor children. He left a will by which he appointed his wife executrix. She filed the will for probate and prayed that a curator ad hoc be appointed to represent the two minor children of the deceased. On June 25, 1913, the plaintiff was appointed to attend the opening and proof of tlie will. On July 3td, on the prayer of the widow, he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Connolly's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  2. Jones v. Lehigh & New England RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Foster v. ElaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1898
  4. Morgan v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API