Legal Opinion

Connolly's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1901No. 1; Appeal, No. 102PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal, No. 102, Oct. T., 1900, by E. H. Flick and Sadie F. Rodgers, executors of Sarah Connolly, deceased, from decree of O. C. Allegheny Co., Nov. T., 1899, No. 65, dismissing exceptions to adjudication in Estate of Martin Connolly, deceased. Exceptions to adjudication.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 102, Oct. T., 1900, by E. H. Flick and Sadie F. Rodgers, executors of Sarah Connolly, deceased, from decree of O. C. Allegheny Co., Nov. T., 1899, No. 65, dismissing exceptions to adjudication in Estate of Martin Connolly, deceased. Exceptions to adjudication. The facts appear by the opinion of Over, J., which was as follows: Martin Connolly died testate on November 28, 1874. In a holographic will dated May 1, 1870, he made the following provisions: “ I, Martin Connolly, being of sound mind and judgment, and being about to make a voyage to Europe for the benefit of my…

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam,

We affirm the decree complained of by the appellants on the clear and able opinion of the learned judge of the orphans’ court.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellants.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nirdlinger's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Cunningham EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Bryan v. AikinCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1912
  4. Willcox's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. Cunningham EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API