Moore v. . Edwards
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClacrkson, J.
The only questions here presented are: (1) The plea of estoppel or res judicata; (2) was the principal in the bond a proper and necessary party to this action ?
Tbe defendant, J. H. Edwards, signed the bond of R. W. Mitchell under C. S., 836, which is as follows: “At any time before the delivery of the property to the plaintiff, the defendant may, if he does not except to the sureties of the plaintiff, require the return thereof, upon giving to the sheriff a written undertaking, payable to the plaintiff, executed by one or more sufficient sureties, to the effect that they are bound in double…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tyler v. . CapehartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Coltrane v. . LaughlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Price v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Piedmont Wagon Co. v. ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Gillam v. . EdmonsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bizzell v. . MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Jefferson v. Southern Land Sales Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Crump v. . LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Leaksville Light & Power Co. v. Georgia Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Nash v. City of MonroeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931