Legal Opinion

Crump v. . Love

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 30, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

If personal property is seized in a claim and delivery proceeding and final judgment rendered, and thereupon the owner of the property pays the judgment and the property is restored to him, can such owner maintain an action for damages for the impairment or deterioration of the property during the time it was so held by the adverse party?

When property is taken by a party in claim and delivery proceedings, he thereupon becomes practically an insurer under the terms of the bond required in such cases. Randolph v. McGowans, 174 N. C., 203; Motor Co. v. Sands, 186 N. C., 732. Therefore, the party…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Price v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Woody v. . Jordan .Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  3. Randolph v. . McGowansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Asher v. . ReizensteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. Moore v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moses v. Town of MorgantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Gust v. Edwards Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Federal Finance & Credit Co. v. TeeterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Gray v. . MewbornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API