Legal Opinion
In Re Fuller
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided June 21, 2006No. 19-30262PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION AND SETTING THE MATTER OYER FOR FURTHER HEARING
PAMELA PEPPER, Bankruptcy Judge.
The trustee has objected to confirmation of the debtors’ Chapter 13 plan, arguing that the plan does not commit all of the debtors’ disposable income to the plan as required by 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(1)(B). The debtors filed their petition after October 17, 2005, the effective date of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPC-PA”). Thus the trustee’s objection calls upon the Court to review and interpret § 1325 and related provisions…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re HardacreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
- In Re JassUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2006
- In Re BarrUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2006
- In Re McGuireUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2006
- In Re PakUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- In Re SlusherUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2007
- Coop v. Frederickson (In Re Frederickson)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- In Re EdmundsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2005
- In Re GuzmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2006
- In Re HeneburyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2007
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.