Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Kenan Transport Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 31, 1971No. 7110UC30PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Protestants contend that Limestone failed to meet the statutory criteria and the rules and regulations of the Utilities Commission in its application for a contract carrier permit. We disagree with the contention.

G.S. 62-262 (i) sets forth the criteria to be used by the Utilities Commission in determining whether a permit is to be granted authorizing an applicant to operate as a contract car rier. This section states that the Commission shall give due consideration to:

“(1) Whether the proposed operations conform with the definition in this chapter of a contract carrier,
“(2)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Petroleum Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. STATE EX REL. UTILITIES COM'N v. JD McCotter, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Brink's, Inc. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. State ex rel. Utilities Commission & Contract Transporter, Inc. v. M.L. Hatcher Pickup & Delivery Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. M. L. Hatcher Pickup & Delivery Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. M.L. Hatcher Pickup & Delivery Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API