State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Kenan Transport Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Protestants contend that Limestone failed to meet the statutory criteria and the rules and regulations of the Utilities Commission in its application for a contract carrier permit. We disagree with the contention.
G.S. 62-262 (i) sets forth the criteria to be used by the Utilities Commission in determining whether a permit is to be granted authorizing an applicant to operate as a contract car rier. This section states that the Commission shall give due consideration to:
“(1) Whether the proposed operations conform with the definition in this chapter of a contract carrier,
“(2)…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Petroleum Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
3Cited by5 opinions
- STATE EX REL. UTILITIES COM'N v. JD McCotter, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Brink's, Inc. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission & Contract Transporter, Inc. v. M.L. Hatcher Pickup & Delivery Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. M. L. Hatcher Pickup & Delivery Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. M.L. Hatcher Pickup & Delivery Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980