Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Utilities Commission & Contract Transporter, Inc. v. M.L. Hatcher Pickup & Delivery Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided August 5, 1980No. 7910UC850Published
1Opinion of the Court
ERWIN, Judge.
Protestant’s appeal is based on three questions. The initial question asks:
“(1) Are the Utilities Commission’s findings of fact sufficient to support its conclusions that the proposed operations conform with the definition of a contract carrier and that the applicant has met the burden of proof prescribed by statute?”
We do not find error.
Contract Carrier
G.S. 62-262(i) sets out what the Commission must consider before it may issue a permit to a contract carrier. G.S. 62-31 authorizes the Commission to make rules and regulations. Pursuant thereto, the Commission promulgated NCUC…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission & Public Service Co. v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Champion Papers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolinas Committee for Industrial Power Rates & Area Development, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Two Way Radio Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Petroleum Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.