Legal Opinion
Baker v. Fenneman & Brown Properties, LLC
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 26, 2003No. 87A04-0210-CV-492PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAY, Judge.
Aaron Baker appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Fenneman & Brown Properties, L.L.C. and Southern Bells of Indiana, Inc., all d/b/a Taco Bell (hereinafter collectively "Taco Bell"). Baker raises one issue, which we restate as whether Taco Bell has a duty to assist a customer who falls to the floor and loses consciousness when the customer's fall was not due to any fault of Taco Bell. 1
We reverse and remand. 2
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On August 26, 1999, Baker entered the Taco Bell store in Newburgh, Indiana, to purchase a soft drink. Upon entering the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Southland Corp. v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Depue v. FlatauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Hovermale v. Berkeley Springs Moose Lodge No. 1483West Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- L.S. Ayres Company v. HicksIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
- Gilbertson v. LeiningerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Trask-Morton v. Motel 6 Operating L.P.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Rasnick v. Krishna Hospitality, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- LA FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC. v. MayerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Salte v. YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago FoundationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- A.S. v. LaPorte Regional Health System, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.