Legal Opinion
L.S. Ayres Company v. Hicks
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided March 25, 1942No. 27,632PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShake, C. J.
The appellee recovered a judgment against the appellant for personal injuries. The assigned errors relate to the overruling of the appellant’s motion for a judgment on the interrogatories and the answers thereto and the motion for a new trial. Under the motion for a new trial it is charged that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence; that it is contrary to law; that there was error in the giving and refusal of certain instructions; that appellee’s counsel was guilty of misconduct; and that the damages are excessive.
John Hicks, the appellee, a six-year-old boy, visited the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Depue v. FlatauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Standard Oil Co. v. BowkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Tippecanoe Loan & Trust Co. v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Buch v. Amory Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Sidney Lundy Claire Lundy v. Adamar of New Jersey, Inc., T/a Trop World, Defendant/third Party v. Dr. Domenic Frank Carlino, Individually Dr. Domenic Frank Carlino, a Professional Association, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Palace Bar, Inc. v. FearnotIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- South v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- J.A.W. v. RobertsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Cooper v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.