Corbett v. McClintic-Marshall Corp.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The grounds of demurrer are four in number. They present, however, only two questions.
The first question is — were the directors required to approve only such annual statement of assets and liabilities submitted to them as would reflect the fair present value of the assets; or, conversely, were they permitted under the language of the redemption clause of the preferred stock article of the charter, to accept the values placed upon the assets by the books and at which they were being carried, regardless of the relation which such values might bear to the true or fair value?
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morris v. American Public Utilities CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
- Gaskill v. Gladys Belle Oil Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1929
- Davis v. Louisville Gas & Electric Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
- Davis v. Louisville Gas Electric Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
- Peters v. United States Mortgage CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Smyth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Fox v. Johnson & Wimsatt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Rubel, Executors v. RubelMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
- John R. Baur v. Baur Farms, Inc. and Robert F. BaurSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Hagan v. DundoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.