State v. Coburn
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Justice.
May workers’ compensation proceeds be considered on the question of the indigency of a criminal defendant? The trial court considered the benefits and on that basis found defendant’s indigency had ceased to exist and we agree. However the trial court was authorized to apply that finding only toward fees thereafter earned by appointed counsel. There was no authority to direct the State to recoup from defendant the fees paid for his trial counsel.
Defendant received a life sentence upon his conviction of first-degree sexual abuse. On his own application his appeal from his…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schmidt v. UhlenhoppSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Zeman v. Canton State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Woodbury County v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- Matter of Estate of AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Beshears v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Harry v. District Court of the Ninth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re the Marriage of BalesCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Harry v. District Court of the Ninth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1981