Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 15, 1993No. 93SA24PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an attorney disciplinary matter. The respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel have entered into a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct. See C.R.C.P. 241.18. The parties have recommended the imposition of either a private or public censure. An inquiry panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the stipulation and agreement and recommended that the respondent receive a public censure. We accept the stipulation and agreement, and the recommendation of the inquiry panel, and order that the respondent be publicly censured and pay the costs…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. People v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. BerkleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. RetrumSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API