Legal Opinion

People v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 16, 1993No. 93SA12PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

An inquiry panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct entered into between the respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel. The parties recommended in the stipulation that the respondent be publicly censured for misconduct involving neglect and misrepresentations. After weighing the seriousness of the respondent’s conduct against certain factors in mitigation, we find it appropriate to accept the stipulation and to order that the respondent be publicly censured and assessed costs.

I

The respondent was admitted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. People v. LaSalleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. People v. BerkleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API