Commonwealth v. Driver
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
William Driver was tried nonjury and was found guilty of robbery, conspiracy, theft, simple assault, and unauthorized use of a vehicle. Subsequently the trial court found the evidence insufficient to sustain the verdict, granted a motion in arrest of judgment, and discharged the defendant. The Commonwealth appealed. We reverse.
The effect of a motion in arrest of judgment is to admit all the facts which the prosecution’s evidence tends to prove. Commonwealth v. Combs, 298 Pa.Super. 527, 529, 445 A.2d 113, 114 (1982). In determining the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. EverettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WestcottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. CarsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. PottsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. CarsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.