Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Wilson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1982No. 1450PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*103WATKINS, Judge:

In this appeal the defendant contends that the court erred in denying his motion in arrest of judgment.

The defendant was found guilty after a trial by jury of robbery, theft, recklessly endangering the life of another person, violations of the Uniform Firearms Act and criminal conspiracy. Post-trial motions were filed, his motion for a new trial was granted and his motion in arrest of judgment was denied. He appeals from this denial.

Two questions are involved in this appeal: (1) defendant’s contention that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the guilty verdict; and (2)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RoscioliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. WaldmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. ViallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. JenschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. RosettiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. DriverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API