Legal Opinion

State v. Phillips

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 11, 1987No. 86-CR-40; CA A40040PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for failure to appear. ORS 162.205. He assigns as error that the court denied his motion for judgment of acquittal. We affirm.

Defendant had been charged with burglary and robbery, both felonies, and was incarcarated awaiting trial. He was released from custody on December 2, 1985, under a release agreement, which provided:

“YOU ARE RELEASED ON THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS:
"* * * * *
“YOU ARE ( ) District Court I will appear and TO APPEAR (XX) Circuit Court answer this charge (s) in the designated court at _M. on Hour

Month Day Year

TO BE SET

<<* * * * *

“GENER…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. EastmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API