Legal Opinion

Ramey v. Cudahy Packing Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1941No. 6252PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

The constitutionality of Act 250 of 1928, in so -far as it purports to repeal paragraph 5(d) of Section 1, Act 179 of 1918, is involved in this case.

Plaintiff sues for wages and penalties under the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., and Act 150 of 1920, as amended by Act 138 of 1936 of the Legislature of this state. He alleges that defendant is a Louisiana corporation with its domicile in the Parish of Orleans and that it maintains a branch office and' place of business in the City of Shreveport, Caddo Parish, which had supervision and control over…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Standard Brewery, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Jackson v. HartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  3. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  4. State v. MortonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  5. State ex rel. Tate v. Brooks-Scanlon Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Brothers of Christian Schools of Lafayette, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. McCullough v. BridgesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  3. McCullough v. BridgesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  4. State v. WelknerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  5. State v. WelknerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API