Steelton Borough v. Booser
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 33, May T.; 1894, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Dauphin Co., Jan. T., 1893, No. 260, in favor of defendant, on trial by court without a jury. Sci. fa. sur municipal lien.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 33, May T.; 1894, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Dauphin Co., Jan. T., 1893, No. 260, in favor of defendant, on trial by court without a jury. Sci. fa. sur municipal lien. The following opinion was filed by McPherson, J.: “ This case was tried without a jury under the provisions of the act of 1874. We find the facts to be as follows: “ 1. The plaintiff was incorporated under the general borough act of 1851. The defendant is the owner of certain real estate in said borough abutting upon Second street, between Mohn and Highland streets. “ 2. In the natural state of the ground…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Trial by jury having been waived, this case was submitted to the court below under the provisions of the act of April 22, 1874.
*638The record contains a clear and concise statement of the facts found by the learned trial judge together with the legal conclusions drawn by him therefrom. The questions presented have been so fully considered and so satisfactorily disposed of that further discussion of any of them is unnecessary. The judgment in favor of the defendant is therefore affirmed.
Judgment affirmed on the opinion of the court below.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Canton Borough v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Braucher v. Somerset BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Pittsburg v. BiggertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Sweigart v. Borough of EphrataCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Correll v. BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.