Legal Opinion

Sweigart v. Borough of Ephrata

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1975No. Appeal, No. 1346 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

Pursuant to the powers delegated by Article XVIII of the Borough Code, Act of February 1, 1966, P.L. (1965) 1656, 53 P.S. §§46801 through 46806, the Borough of Ephrata, Lancaster County, enacted an ordinance requiring property owners to construct sidewalks when directed to do so by Borough Council and providing that in the event of the owner’s failure to do so the Borough would have the work done at the owner’s cost. The Borough directed the appellant, Ralph H. Sweigart, to install a sidewalk in September 1972 and, upon the appellant’s failure to comply, it informed him…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ligonier Valley Railroad v. Latrobe BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. Ross v. Philadelphia Federation of TeachersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Mahanoy City Borough v. HerskerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Philadelphia v. WeaverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  5. Smith v. Kingston BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pace Motels, Inc. v. Township of LoyalsockCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Appeal of McLane, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1983
  3. Commonwealth v. Valence, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API