Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Transitone Automobile Radio Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 6, 1933No. Appeal, 314PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

This is an action to recover the amount due on a written salary contract which plaintiff alleges defendant assumed. The jury rendered a verdict in plaintiff’s favor for §10,741.34. The court below entered judgment non obstante veredicto for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

On February 17,1930, plaintiff entered into a contract with Automobile Radio Corporation under which he was employed as its sales manager for three years, commencing March 1, 1930, at a salary of §10,000 a year. He continued in its employ until October of the same year, when he was informed by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weinglass v. GibsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Guaranty Motors Co. v. Hudford Philadelphia Sales Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. McCahan's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Bedell v. BerwickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. 2401 Pennsylvania Avenue Corp. v. Federation of Jewish AgenciesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Poch v. Equit. L. Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Poch v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Hetkowski v. Dickson City Borough School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Stewart Et Vir v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API