Legal Opinion

Schweitzer v. City of Whitefish

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 2016No. DA 16-0018PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 T. Warren Schweitzer and Ingela Schnittger (Appellants) appeal the order of the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, granting the City of Whitefish’s (City) cross-motion for summary judgment. We restate the issue on appeal as follows:

Did the District Court err by granting summary judgment on the basis of claim preclusion ?

¶2 We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶3 Appellants own Lots 28 and 29 of the Houston Lake Shore Tracts located, at 2154 Houston Drive, in Whitefish. This property is adjacent to Whitefish Lake, which the City has annexed. Appellants have owned this…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lorang v. Fortis InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Baltrusch v. BaltruschMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Brilz v. Metropolitan General InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Brad v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Brannon v. Lewis & Clark CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reisbeck v. Farmers Ins.Montana Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Reisbeck v. Farmers Ins.Montana Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Hale v. HartDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API