Francais v. Somps
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.
This action is brought to recover one thousand dollars against the defendant as a director of the Yosemite Queen Gold, Silver, and Lead Mining Company, a corporation, for omitting to cause to be made and posted an itemized account or balance-sheet on the first Mondays of November and December, 1886, and the first Monday of January, 1887, as required by the provisions of an act amendatory of an act entitled “An act for the better protection of the stockholders in corporations formed under the laws of the state of California, for the purpose- of carrying on and conducting the business of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People ex rel. Attorney-General v. ParvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Loveland v. GarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Schenck v. BandmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Beal v. OsborneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Chapman v. DorayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by7 opinions
- Troester v. Starbucks CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Ball v. TolmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Llewellyn Iron WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Fidelity Adjustment Co. v. CookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- People v. MerrittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.