Legal Opinion

Schenck v. Bandmann

California Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1889No. 12380PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

The plaintiff commenced this action to recover judgment against the defendants for one thousand dollars liquidated damages, with costs of suit, under the provisions of an act of the legislature of this state, approved April 23, 1880 (Stats. 1880, p. 134). The case was submitted in the court below upon an agreed statement of facts, and judgment was given for plaintiff as prayed for in his complaint. The appeal is from the judgment, and rests on the judgment roll.

The facts of the case, as they were agreed to and found by the court, are as follows: In September, 1880, the Pittsburg…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Loveland v. GarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miles v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Ball v. TolmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Francais v. SompsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Chapman v. DorayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API