Legal Opinion

Mayers v. Ridley

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 19, 1971No. Civ. A. No. 3749-70PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CORCORAN, District Judge.

I

Plaintiffs are home owners in the District of Columbia whose deeds to their homes, recorded with the D. C. Recorder of Deeds, contain a racially restrictive covenant. They have brought this suit as a class action against the Recorder of Deeds and the Mayor-Commissioner of the District of Columbia on their own behalf and on behalf of all home owners in the District of Columbia whose deeds to property include like covenants. They seek to enjoin the Recorder from accepting for filing any instrument which contains a racially restrictive covenant, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Youngblood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  3. Dancy v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Daniel K. Mayers v. Peter S. RidleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Woodward v. BowersDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Daniel K. Mayers v. Peter S. RidleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API