Legal Opinion

Daniel K. Mayers v. Peter S. Ridley

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 30, 1972No. 71-1418Published

1Opinion of the Court

465 F.2d 630

151 U.S.App.D.C. 45

Daniel K. MAYERS et al., Appellants

v.

Peter S. RIDLEY et al.

No. 71-1418.

United States Court of Appeals,

District of Columbia Circuit.

Reconsidered March 1, 1972.

Decided June 30, 1972.

Mr. Michael J. Waggoner, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Jack B. Owens and Ralph J. Temple, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellants.

Mr. Ted. D. Kuemmerling, Asst. Corp. Counsel for the District of Columbia, with whom Messrs. C. Francis Murphy, Corp. Counsel, and Richard W. Barton, Asst. Corp. Counsel, were on the brief, for appellees.

On Reconsideration En Banc

Before…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence; Dissent · Tamm; Dissent · MacKINNON.

2Cases cited77 opinions

  1. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API