Legal Opinion
United States v. DiLoreto
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 7, 1989No. Nos. 88-3635, 88-3636, 88-3660, 88-3694 and 88-3708PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MANSMANN, Circuit Judge.
Each of the five defendants before us, convicted as a participant in a conspiracy to distribute narcotics, raises issues peculiar to his particular conviction. In addition, each adopts, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28(i), the arguments of every other defendant. Hence, these appeals present us with a number of alleged errors. We conclude, however, that resolution of these appeals rests on one point in particular, common to all defendants. The credibility of the government’s witnesses was a chief issue at trial, one contested by all…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. SomersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Wright-BarkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Foster v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Hector Francisco MolinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- UNITED STATES of America v. Darus H. ZEHRBACH, Appellant in No. 93-7477. Alex A. Mervis, Appellant in No. 93-7493Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.