Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rich v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 13, 2005No. PD-1275-03Published

1Dissent

HOLCOMB, J.,

dissenting, in which MEYERS, J., joined.

I respectfully dissent. The trial court’s error in prohibiting appellant from asking the venire members a proper question was, under binding precedent, an error of constitutional dimension,1 and it is therefore inappropriate for this Court to remand the case to the court of appeals for a harm analysis under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 44.2(b), which is our harmless error rule for non-constitutional errors. For this Court to remand this case for a harm analysis under Rule 44.2(b) will only serve to compound the errors already committed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. Janecka v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. Wallace v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API