Rich v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Dissent
HOLCOMB, J.,
dissenting, in which MEYERS, J., joined.
I respectfully dissent. The trial court’s error in prohibiting appellant from asking the venire members a proper question was, under binding precedent, an error of constitutional dimension,1 and it is therefore inappropriate for this Court to remand the case to the court of appeals for a harm analysis under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 44.2(b), which is our harmless error rule for non-constitutional errors. For this Court to remand this case for a harm analysis under Rule 44.2(b) will only serve to compound the errors already committed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Janecka v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Wallace v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.