Legal Opinion
Hines v. Bacon
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 5, 1923No. 11285PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RAY, C.
This is an appeal from an order quashing the summons.
June 12, 1919, plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, paid to the county treasurer, under protest, $466.28 taxes, claimed by plaintiffs to be illegal, and, at the same time, gave the notice required by statute of their intention to bring an action to recover the same under section 7, subd. B, art. 1, chap. 107, Sess. Laws 1915, which provides:
“* * * It shall be the duty of such collecting officer to hold such taxes separate and apart from all other taxes collécted by him, for a period of thirty days and if -within such time…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Collins v. ParksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Aggers v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Continental Ins. Co. v. NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Lawton v. NicholasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vemco Plating, Inc. v. Denver Fire Clay CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Stice v. Consolidated Indiana Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1940
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Ind. Comm. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1929
- Braden v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Pittman v. ComptonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1968