Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Nisbet v. Coulter

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1935No. 25740. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blake, J. —

The defendant is a clerk and director of consolidated school district No. 10, in Jefferson county. The relators are legal voters of the district. Pursuant to Rem. Rev. Stat., § 5351 [P. O. § 2306], they, with other legal voters of the district, filed with defendant, as clerk, a petition for his recall as director of the district.

The defendant having refused to formulate a ballot synopsis of the charges contained in the petition, as required by Rem. Rev. Stat., §5352 [P. C. §2307], relators, pursuant to Rem. Rev. Stat., § 5363 [P. C. § 2318], petitioned the superior court for a writ…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pybus v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State Ex Rel. Walter v. HoughtonWashington Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Recall of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re Recall of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Skidmore v. FullerWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. In re the Recall of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API