Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Walter v. Houghton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1931No. 23282. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— This mandamus action in the lower court grew out of a recall proceeding whereby the voters of a consolidated school district in Snohomish county are attempting to recall two of its directors, one of whom is appellant and who is also clerk of the district. Recall charges were formulated and filed with appellant as clerk of the district, who refused to furnish a ballot synopsis as provided by law. Thereupon relator, on behalf of himself and six other electors selected at a meeting of legal voters of the school district, petitioned for a mandate to compel appellant to carry out his duties…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cudihee v. PhelpsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Gibson v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Pybus v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Teaford v. HowardWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Morton v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Danielson v. FaymonvilleWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Cappola v. PlattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  5. State Ex Rel. Nisbet v. CoulterWashington Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API