Legal Opinion

Quezada v. City of Providence, Rhode Island

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided March 29, 2021No. 1:18-cv-00611Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND ____________________________________ ) ANA QUEZADA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 18-611 WES ) CITY OF PROVIDENCE, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM E. SMITH, District Judge. Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 18, filed by the City of Providence (“Defendant” or “City”). In the alternative, Defendant moves for partial summary judgment as to Plaintiff’s claim of damages for emotional distress. For the reasons explained below, Defendant’s Motion is DENIED in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. National Amusements, Inc. v. Town of DedhamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API