Lerner v. Power
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Order reversed, without costs, and the designating petition invalidated in the following memorandum: The undisputed evidence establishes as a matter of law that the questioned petitions were the product of the knowing, systematic acceptance of purported signatures of innumerable persons subscribed by others, thus constituting permeating fraudulent representation.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Korbman*. Taking no part: Judge Keating.
Designated pursuant to section 2 of article ATI of the State Constitution in place of Burke, J., disqualified.
2Cited by14 opinions
- Mercorella v. BenzaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Ruiz v. McKennaNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Lavine v. ImbrotoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Layden v. GargiuloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Villafane v. CabanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.