Legal Opinion

Lerner v. Power

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1968PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed, without costs, and the designating petition invalidated in the following memorandum: The undisputed evidence establishes as a matter of law that the questioned petitions were the product of the knowing, systematic acceptance of purported signatures of innumerable persons subscribed by others, thus constituting permeating fraudulent representation.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Korbman*. Taking no part: Judge Keating.

Designated pursuant to section 2 of article ATI of the State Constitution in place of Burke, J., disqualified.

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mercorella v. BenzaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Ruiz v. McKennaNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Lavine v. ImbrotoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Layden v. GargiuloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. Villafane v. CabanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API