Ketchin v. Patrick
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Pressley, J., Fairfield, September, 1889. Action by Thomas H. Ketchin against T. Gr. and Robert A. Patrick for the recovery of 121 acres of land.
Read the full summary
Before Pressley, J., Fairfield, September, 1889. Action by Thomas H. Ketchin against T. Gr. and Robert A. Patrick for the recovery of 121 acres of land. The following requests to charge were submitted by defendants : 1- That where partition is made, each partitioner becomes warrantor to all the others to the extent of his share; that all the other co-tenants had warranted to these defendants in the partition ; and that if the land in dispute was exempt from execution in the hands of Marion R. Mobley, it was therefore exempt in the hands of defendants. 2. That if the jury find this tract of…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mr. Justice McIver.
This was an action to recover possession of real estate, and the facts necessary to a proper understanding of the questions involved are substantially as follows : Marion R. Mobley, with her eight children, two of whom were Edward P. Mobley, jr., and Moses H. Mobley, owned as tenants in common, each being entitled to one-ninth, a certain tract of land in the County of Fairfield, containing 3,771 acres. R. T. Mockbee having recovered a judgment in February, 1884, against *448Marion R. Mobley, Edward P. Mobley, jr., and Moses H. Mobley,…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Nixon Grocery Co. v. SpannSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
- Marion County Lumber Co. v. Tilghman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
- Barron v. EnglishSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Ex Parte JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- Eaddy v. Wall, SheriffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.