Legal Opinion

Hilda Vigil v. Taos Ski Valley, Inc.

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided September 25, 2026No. 1:25-cv-01323Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO _______________________ HILDA VIGIL, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:25-cv-01323-KWR-JFR TAOS SKI VALLEY, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Def.’s Mot. J. Pleadings, Doc. 19. Defendant argues that its motion should be granted because (1) Plaintiff seeks a remedy that is “explicitly barred by Tenth Circuit precedent,” (2) “[Defendant] did not breach any duty owed Plaintiff,” and…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API