Legal Opinion

William Grace Co. v. Kane

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 29, 1906No. Gen. No. 12,798PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action in case for negligence. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Gaby, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1905.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

The contentions of appellant’s counsel are that appellant was not guilty of negligence, that appellee assumed the risk of the work, and that the court erred in the admission of evidence for appellee, and in refusal to take the case from the jury.

Appellee was employed by appellant January 13, 1904, after the appellant’s other employes had been working sometime in clearing away the wreckage. He worked all day on the 13th and worked a little more than an hour on the 14th, when the accident happened. He testified that Allen, who was foreman under the head foreman, Martin, told him to get a stone…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Armour v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Simmons v. Chicago & Tomah RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Clark v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Western Wrecking & Lumber Co. v. O'DonnellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
  5. Peoria, D. & E. Ry. Co. v. HardwickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McParland v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API