Legal Opinion

McParland v. Stewart

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1928No. Docket No. 101, Calendar No. 33,596PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Defendant Stewart employed defendant Jordan by the day to tear down an old barn. Jordan employed plaintiff to help and paid him by the day. In the course of demolition of the barn, Jordan directed plaintiff to loosen a plate-pin, and, in going to do so, he stepped on some boards insecurely covering a hay chute, fell down the chute and fractured a leg bone and several ribs. This suit was brought to recover damages, and, in the circuity plaintiff had verdict ahd judgment. Defendants review by writ of error, presenting many points, only one of which need be considered.

Liability of defendants was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ballard & Ballard Co. v. Lee's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. William Grace Co. v. KaneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. E. J. O'Brien & Co. v. Shelton's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Reynolds v. Security Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API