Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 2, 1934No. 22394PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

The plaintiff, J. W. Wilcox, sued the defendant, A. T. Reynolds, in the district court of Dewey county, Okla., to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract to convey real estate. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the plaintiff’s evidence and instructed a verdict in favor of the defendant and rendered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals. The parties appear here as they appeared in the trial court, and will be referred to herein as plaintiff and defendant.

The defendant, as the owner of certain lands in Dewey county, entered into a contract with plaintiff as broker, whereby…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arnold v. National Bank of WaupacaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Bateman v. RichardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Eastburn v. Joseph Espalla, Jr., & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Porter v. BuckleyOregon Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ellsworth Dobbs, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  2. Kincaid v. Black Angus Motel, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. McDonald v. HumphriesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. Butcher v. McGinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Canon v. ChapmanDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API