Legal Opinion

Bateman v. Richard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 6, 1925No. 14979PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

The defendants in eirror, Richard & Blake, a real estate firm, as plaintiffs, instituted this action against the plaintiff in error, F. A. Bateman, as defendant, to recover $3,000 alleged to be due as commission for the sale of certain land.

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiffs’ petition alleged, in substance, that about March 1, 1919, the defendant listed a section of land with plaintiffs for sale “at the net price, of $32,000, said land to be sold by June 1, 1919, or the contract •.shall be at an end”.

Plaintiffs filed an amended…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Allen v. J. A. Clopton Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Louva v. WordenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Phillips' v. RudyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Matheney, Beasley & Koon v. GodinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  5. Snow v. MacfarlaneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Maine v. GarvinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. McDonald v. HumphriesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Wilcox v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Equitable Life Assurance Soc. of United States v. HomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Shorten v. MuellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API