Legal Opinion
Doe v. Harris
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 30, 1980No. 79 Civ. 589 (JMC)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CANNELLA, District Judge:
Motion by plaintiff, for judgment on the pleadings, is granted. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c).
Motion by defendant, for judgment on the pleadings, is denied. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c).
This matter is remanded to the Secretary for further proceedings in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Jurisdiction is based upon the Social Security Act. Id.
FACTS
There is no dispute about the facts leading up to claimant’s current psychiatric condition. Claimant began working as a New York City Police Officer in 1968, when he was twenty-eight years old.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Helene Marcus v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Shirley A. Ber v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Angelica Rivera v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Doe v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- Doe v. RostkerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981
- Doe v. United Services Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- State v. McKeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Lebus v. HarrisDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.