Legal Opinion

Akkaya v. Attorney General of the United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 15, 2008No. 07-4441Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Petitioners seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying their motion to reconsider its previous dismissal as untimely of their appeal from an order of removal issued by an Immigration Judge (“U”). For the following reasons, we will deny their petition for review.

I

Petitioners are natives and citizens of Turkey. The lead petitioner is Hayrettin Akkaya; the others are his children, whose claims are derivative of his. They were admitted as conditional permanent residents in 1998 by reason of the father’s marriage to a United States citizen. His wife…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Jose Borges v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  3. Nazir Ahmad Popal v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States Bureau of Immigration & Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  4. Poole v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. Chuks Goddy Nwogu v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API