Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 18, 2010No. 02-1467 VPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REVIEW
DAMICH, Judge.
On January 4, 2010, Petitioner filed a Motion for Review of the decision of the Special Master awarding Petitioner attorneys’ fees and costs in the underlying action. In conjunction with the motion for review, Petitioner has also moved for “summary affirmance,” in effect payment of interim fees, of the undisputed portion of the fees awarded Petitioner below and for “de novo determination of unadjudicated claims” (that is, fees for litigating the fees award itself) as well as for certification of certain questions to the United States Court of Appeals…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Nathaniel Saxton, by and Through His Legal Representatives, Steven and Candace Saxton v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Abbott v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Abbott v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Andrews v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Anthony v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Anthony v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.