Legal Opinion
Hawes v. Johnson & Johnson
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 15, 1996No. Civil Action 94-5332 (NHP)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEDGES, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before me on plaintiffs’ motion to substitute a party pursuant to Rule 25(a) due to the death of plaintiff Manohar Kadam (Kadam). I have considered the papers submitted in support of and in opposition to the motion. There was no oral argument. Rule 78.
One of the original plaintiffs in this action, Kadam, died on August 15, 1995. 1 On September 1, 1995, Letters Testamentary were issued to his wife, Vanita Kadam (Mrs. Kadam), naming her as executor of the estate of Kadam. On the same date, plaintiffs’ counsel filed a pleading in this…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- William T. Turner v. Schering-Plough CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Rodriguez v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Jaime Blum, Brij Kapur and James C. Spitsbergen, in 86-5349 v. Witco Chemical Corporation, in 86-5310Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Montells v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Timeless Investments, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Gasior v. Massachusetts General HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Kulling v. Grinders for Industry, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
- Kettner v. Compass Group USA, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Weatherford U.S., L.P. v. U.S. Dep't of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.