Kaur v. Bharmota, Unpublished Decision (9-19-2006)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Parkash Kaur ("appellant"), appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Probate Court adopting the magistrate's decision and declaring that defendant-appellee, Satya Bharmota ("appellee"), is the lawful surviving spouse of decedent Harjit S. Bharmota ("decedent"). For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.
{¶ 2} On December 17, 2001, appellant filed a complaint in the Franklin County Probate Court to have herself declared the lawful surviving spouse of decedent. Appellee answered appellant's complaint, claiming that she, not appellant, was the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. UngerOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Oakbrook Realty Corp. v. BloutOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Frank Lerner & Associates, Inc. v. VassyOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
3Cited by6 opinions
- Huntington Natl. Bank v. HaehnOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- In re Estate of MasonOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Maxwell v. LombardiOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Bentley v. Grey Fox Homes, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Scranton-Averell, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Fiscal OfficerOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.