Huntington Natl. Bank v. Haehn
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKlatt, J.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Chris Haehn, appeals a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting the foreclosure sought by plaintiff-appellee, The Huntington National Bank ("Huntington"). For the following reasons, we affirm that judgment.
{¶ 2} On March 12, 2004, Haehn executed a note in which he promised to pay $244,000, plus interest, to his lender, Sky Bank. Haehn also granted Sky Bank a mortgage on his residence, located at 93 W. King Avenue, to secure the note.
{¶ 3} In 2007, Sky Bank merged into Huntington. At that point, Huntington assumed Sky Bank's interest in Haehn's…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Continental Insurance v. WhittingtonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ltd. Invest. Group Corp. v. Huntington Natl. BankOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- New Technology Products Pty, Ltd. v. Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Maxwell v. LombardiOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Pond v. PondOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. BirovsekOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.