Legal Opinion
Matter of Konopka
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided October 4, 1991Published
1Opinion of the Court
126 N.J. 225 (1991)
596 A.2d 733
IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL A. KONOPKA, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued October 24, 1989.
Decided October 4, 1991.
Thomas J. McCormick, Deputy Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of Office of Attorney Ethics.
Douglas H. Burg argued the cause for respondent (Frank A. Ferrante, attorney).
2Per curiam
This attorney-disciplinary proceeding arose from a random audit of the trust funds of respondent, Michael A. Konopka. As a result of the audit, the Office of Attorney Ethics (OAE) filed a complaint against respondent charging him with misappropriation of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited29 opinions
- In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- In re MarksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- In Re JacobSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.