Legal Opinion
Arkansas River Co. v. United States
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Decided October 13, 1993No. 4:90-cv-00240PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAVIDSON, District Judge.
Defendant, United States of America, has filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Despite the fact that the government has moved for judgment on the pleadings, it has attached exhibits and affidavits which it advances in support of its motion. Likewise, Arkansas River Company, plaintiff, calls the court’s attention to various exhibits and affidavits which it submits in response to the government’s motion. A motion for judgment on the pleadings is a self-descriptive motion which aptly…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arkansas River Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1996
- Nelkin & Nelkin P.C. v. Two Rivers Coffee, LLC, Steven Schreiber, Eugene Schreiber, and Sarah SchreiberUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2026