Legal Opinion

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. RAMONE E. HICKS

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 2015No. SD32968PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DON E. BURRELL,

— OPINION AUTHOR

A jury found Ramone E. Hicks (“Defendant”) guilty of first-degree robbery, first-degree burglary, and armed criminal action. See sections 569.020, 569.160, and 571.015. 1 On appeal, Defendant claims: (1) the trial court plainly erred in denying his oral motion for continuance; and (2) the trial court erred in overruling his hearsay objection to a question about another witness’s identification of Defendant. Finding no merit in either claim, we affirm.

Facts Adduced at Trial

Defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convictions,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lee v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. State v. DegraffenreidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. State v. ForrestSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  4. State v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  5. State v. SchaalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hicks v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. RAMONE J. HICKS v. STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. KEVIN C. NEWMANMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. MAXWELL BARNESMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API