Legal Opinion

Commissioner v. Wemyss

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 26, 1945No. 629PublishedCited by 253 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter

In 1939 taxpayer proposed marriage to Mrs. More, a widow with one child. Her deceased husband had set up two trusts, one half the income of which was for the benefit of Mrs. More and the other half for that of the child with provision that, in the event of Mrs. More’s remarriage, her part of the income ceased and went to the child. The corpus of the two trusts consisted of stock which brought to Mrs. More from the death of her first husband to her remarriage, about five years later, an average income of $5,484 a year. On Mrs. More’s unwillingness to suffer loss of her trust income through…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. HeiningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Commissioner v. Scottish American Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Smith v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Robinette v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by253 opinions

  1. Trust Under the Will of Bingham v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. U. S. Bank N. A. v. Village at Lakeridge, LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  4. Dickman v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Harris v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

248 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API