Legal Opinion
In Re Mathesius
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 30, 2006PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rivera-Soto
Based in large measure on stipulated, admitted, or uncontested facts, the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct (Advisory Committee) filed a Presentment against Superior Court Judge Wilbur H. Mathesius. Tracking the allegations of the formal complaint originally filed against him, the Presentment found, by clear and convincing evidence, that Judge Mathesius had violated Canons 1, 2A, 3A(3), 3A(6), and 3A(10) of the Code of Judicial Conduct and Rule 2:15-8(a)(6), and recommended that Judge Mathesius be suspended for a period of six months, but that “only three months of his suspension be…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Craig v. HarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gentile v. State Bar of Nev.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- O'Donoghue v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against ZieglerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- In re DiLeoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
- In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against EilerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- In re BoggiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- State v. TaimangloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.